Category: Hepatitis C Transmission

Let's get the Truth about Hep. C was: Re: Off topic…

Question:

In article <ec181702.0410040311.631de…@posting.google.com>,  hepautoma…@hotmail.com (Kim) wrote:

[...] > There is a study, perhaps more then one, that does suggest that the > more infected blood a person is contaminated with, the more > aggressively the disease progresses.

I know that I’ve read that there seems to be an innate immune system difference in people who naturally clear the virus and those who don’t, but that the ability to clear also is associated with how much of the virus they’ve been exposed to. Is that what you’re talking about?  Or is there something else? Gordo

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Gordo Mondragon <ga_mondra…@yahoo.com> wrote in message <news:ga_mondragon-BF8312.08553804102004@nycmny-nntp-rdr-03-ge1.rdc-nyc.rr.com>… > In article <ec181702.0410040311.631de…@posting.google.com>, >  hepautoma…@hotmail.com (Kim) wrote: > [...] > > There is a study, perhaps more then one, that does suggest that the > > more infected blood a person is contaminated with, the more > > aggressively the disease progresses. > I know that I’ve read that there seems to be an innate immune system > difference in people who naturally clear the virus and those who don’t, > but that the ability to clear also is associated with how much of the > virus they’ve been exposed to. > Is that what you’re talking about?  

Yes, that is what I am talking about. I have no time lately to post the supporting data. September is a busy month. Kim Or is there something else? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Gordo

Response:

LOL…. I didn’t read through the entire thread, I usually enjoy reading Rons posts, but I was curious as to why this was being posted to Child protective Services. Anything goes in usenet I suppose! Kim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Gordo Mondragon <ga_mondra…@yahoo.com> wrote in message <news:ga_mondragon-BF8312.08553804102004@nycmny-nntp-rdr-03-ge1.rdc-nyc.rr.com>… > In article <ec181702.0410040311.631de…@posting.google.com>, >  hepautoma…@hotmail.com (Kim) wrote: > [...] > > There is a study, perhaps more then one, that does suggest that the > > more infected blood a person is contaminated with, the more > > aggressively the disease progresses. > I know that I’ve read that there seems to be an innate immune system > difference in people who naturally clear the virus and those who don’t, > but that the ability to clear also is associated with how much of the > virus they’ve been exposed to. > Is that what you’re talking about?  Or is there something else? > Gordo

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -smith21…@hotmail.com (Ron) wrote in message <news:508cd70b.0410030616.25e4e4e7@posting.google.com>… > Gordo Mondragon <ga_mondra…@yahoo.com> wrote in message <news:ga_mondragon-439AE2.23024402102004@nycmny-nntp-rdr-03-ge1.rdc-nyc.rr.com>… > > In article <rsmul0132p5o58atua897jpn7rq428p…@4ax.com>, > >  Thomas Wagner <t…@capecod.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:50:38 -0400, "Sherman" <Sherm…@adelphia.com> > > > wrote: > > > >Any research on the subject will reveal that the contamination causation is > > > >not fully known.  The source of the infection is unknown for enough of a > > > >percentage of cases that one cannot say with any certainty that "The only > > > >route of infection for Hepatitis C is by direct blood-to-blood contact." > > > One can, indeed. Try the CDC website: > > > http://www.cdc.gov/node.do/id/0900f3ec80007384 > > Actually, the Hep C "Factsheet" at that site says: > > "blood or body fluids from an infected person enters the body of a > > person who is not infected."   > > I think what’s going on is the use of "not fully known" to imply that > > there’s so little known that what’s known is significantly incomplete or > > wrong.  That’s just not the case, and I think that’s what Thomas is > > responding to.  It’s not like it’s going to turn out that Hep C is > > spread by sneezing.   > > To me what’s scary is just how little blood seems to have to get into > > the recipient in order for infection to occur.   > > > >As to the sources of the contamination, there is always the possiblility of > > > >fecal contamination of food which may cause a Hep C infection possibility. > > > Nonsense. > > The actual events necessary to have this be possible are too disgusting > > to even consider.  And so unlikely as to be not worth bringing up. > > Gordo > I wonder how much is really known about the virus transfer.  I did not > contact mine with direct blood to blood contact. I suspect a cocaine > straw back in the 70’s. I suppose the right conditions would transfer > the virus with a hand shake if both people had small open cuts. I > believe the amount of virus contacted is more important than how is > was contacted. >                                                               Ron

There is a study, perhaps more then one, that does suggest that the more infected blood a person is contaminated with, the more aggressively the disease progresses. Kim

Response:

Sherman’s argument that fecal contamination as being a route of infection for hepc is utter bullcrap.  I’ve been throwing poo poos at people for years and NONE have ever been infected. Someone should smash the hell out of Sherman’s computer for spreading such nonsense.   Elmo ///////////// As to the sources of the contamination, there is always the possiblility of fecal contamination of food which may cause a Hep C infection possibility. Nonsense. Thomas

HVC and fathering

Question:

what you need to watch out for is the medication you are taking for HCV…these meds can harm the child.                      spd

Response:

You won’t infect your wife or your child if you decide to have a baby. It’s rarely passed on thru heterosexual contact of from a father to his son/daughter.  Blood to blood is it.   Elmo http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile

Response:

On 27 Jun 2004 07:13:47 -0700, audax…@hotmail.com (dax) wrote: >…a google search has not given me a real clear response on this… i >am seropositive for the HVC antibody but have no symptoms of >illness… was probably infected in the late 80’s… >    My partner is not seropositive. How safe is it for us to attempt >conceiving a child? can she be infected through semen or does there >have to be blood/blood contact?

Here’s one recent report: Sexual Transmission of HCV Is Rare in Monogamous Heterosexual Couples   May 13, 2004

Global HIV epidemic fueled by UN war on drugs policies

Question:

The only epidemic is the epidemic of lie and exaggeerations. Excerpted from United News of India:

Once again, relevance? Some functionary in India rejects the EXTENT of the epidemic in India, not the FACT of it. And frankly, it wouldn’t matter if he did. This is India’s bureaucratic way of keeping its collective governmental head stuck directly up its ass with regard to what to DO about HIV there. And the epidemic in India is as diverse as India. In Manipur it is not the same as it is in Kolkata or in Mumbai or in Chennai. The recent edition of Science has a series of fascinating articles by Jon Cohen that provide some insight. I’ve been there. It is an incredible country and I very much love it. But there are aspects of the bureaucracy–as anywhere–that are despicable and ridiculous, even while they are quintessentially Indian. Sinha and Ganguly (head of ICMR) believe the pandemic is not so large: may they turn out to be correct!! And may they work hard to assure education, prevention programs and treatment programs move forward to assure that the pandemic there is arrested and people with HIV are provided treatment. There is enormous work that needs to be done to improve hospitals and assure that physicians show up for work!!                 George M. Carter

Response:

The only epidemic is the epidemic of lie and exaggeerations. Excerpted from United News of India: CIA Report on HIV/AIDS Baseless by Annapurna Jha November 10, 2002 ”Mr Gates interest in HIV/AIDS projects in India is not meant for charity, as it appears. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation contributing funds to fight AIDS is to protect his billions of dollars of investments in pharmaceutical companies interested in conducting field trials in India,” Mr Mulloli said. Health Minister Shatrughan Sinha has already rejected the CIA report, and the National Intelligence Council clearly stated the CIA estimates to be ‘highly exaggerated’ and not based on surveillance data collected in India. Mr Gates has reportedly funded the controversial report and also made huge investments in companies involved in AIDS drug research. Charging that the CIA’s direct and unwarranted involvement in Indian public health issues amounted to direct intervention in its domestic affairs and a challenge to its soverignity, Mr Mulloli questioned the basis on which the CIA said that 310,000 people had died in India due to AIDS in 1999 alone. The Indian Parliament talked of a mere 114 AIDS related deaths in 1999. Excerpted from Pioneer News Service, New Delhi: Sinha Rejects US Report on AIDS November 10, 2002 India has rejected an US intelligence agency report which projects that the country will have over 25 million people suffering with AIDS by 2010 even as an NGO charged that the report was aimed at exploiting Indian market for AIDS drugs and vaccines. Excerpted from the Daily Pioneer: Mysterious Malaise by Purushottaman Mulloli of JackIndia November 17, 2002 The CIA says India will have 25 million infected people by 2010, the maximum in any country. But India has recorded only 287 AIDS deaths in 1997, 217 in 1998, and 114 in 1999. In whose interest is it to push up these figures?

Response:

AIDS Alert, May 2004 v19 i5 pS3(2) Global HIV epidemic fueled by UN policies: study says major funding, changes needed soon. New HIV epidemics in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and China are spreading fast due to injection drug use (IDU) transmission, and these epidemics will continue to escalate unless the United Nations and individual countries make major policy changes, a new report charges. "Our 20 years of experience in how to address [HIV prevention among] vulnerable populations are not at all being put to use among drug users," says Kasia Malinowska-Sempruch, director of the International Harm Reduction Development Program at the Open Society Institute in New York City. "The U.N. convention criminalizes possession of drugs even for personal use," she says. This approach marginalizes IDU communities, pushing their drug use underground, which facilitates the sharing of needles and spread of HIV, Malinowska-Sempruch explains. The result is the situation now at hand, according to the report Illicit Drug Policies and the Global HIV Epidemic: * HIV has spread rapidly among former Soviet Union states, where 1% of the populations in Russia and the Ukraine (1.4 million people total) are infected with HIV; HIV rates tripled in Russia between 2000 and 2003; among IDUs in Russia, 80% are HIV-positive. (1) * In the Central Asian nation of Uzbekistan, 60% of all HIV cases are among IDUs, and in Kazakhstan, 80% of the estimated 25,000 people. An estimated I million to 1.5 million people in China are HIV infected, and an estimated 64% of these cases are due to IDU transmission. (1) * Of the estimated 59,200 HIV cases in Vietnam, nearly 60% are believed to be due to IDUs; likewise, 76% of the 51,000 HIV cases registered in Malaysia were among IDUs. * In Burma, a large producer of heroin, there are reports that more than 680,000 people are infected with HIV, and nearly a third of these cases are thought to be due to contaminated injection equipment. (1) Instead of tackling the epidemic head-on with harm-reduction strategies, such as providing drug treatment and clean needles, which would prevent it from spreading to the general population, these nations have followed the U.N.’s lead in treating drug users like criminals, MalinowskaSempruch says. "Many people are hostile to drug use as a principle … and do not put into place harm reduction programs," she notes. "The U.N. has not spoken in favor of harm reduction, so it provides cover to people who are not sympathetic." Without harm-reduction programs, which were used very successfully in Australia, the United Kingdom, Poland, Canada, and some Western European nations, it’s likely HIV epidemics will grow in many of these countries where the epidemics are relatively new, Malinowska-Sempruch says. Although organizations like the Open Society Institute are doing what they can to introduce harm reduction programs to Russia and other countries, these efforts provide only a small amount of coverage and cannot stop HIV from spreading, she explains. For instance, the Open Society along with the British Development Agency have funded nearly four dozen harm-reduction programs in Russia, but even at that number, the programs reach only 5% to 7% of the people who need assistance, she says. "Unless the government steps in and uses its own clinics and AIDS centers to spread information out to people, we’re not stopping the epidemic, and we only have a large-scale pilot program," Malinowska-Sempruch says. So it will be crucial for nations to change their policies regarding IDUs and to fund programs that help stop the HIV epidemic rather than worsening the problem. With these goals in mind, the Open Society report makes very specific recommendations for the United Nations, including the following: * The United Nations needs to embrace harm reduction with a drug control convention that explicitly supports HIV prevention for drug users, rather than continue to offer ambiguous messages on the topic. For instance, the World Health Organization and UNAIDS say the United Nations supports harm reduction efforts at the same time that the Office on Drugs and Crime takes no position on harm reduction and the Inter-national Narcotics Control Board (INCB) condemn harm reduction as contributing to drug abuse. * Governments in Asia and the former Soviet Union, which have established HIV epidemics due to IDU transmission, imprison drug users and offer only abstinence-based treatment–all of which only increases the spread of HIV. Instead, what is needed is funding for sterile injection equipment and other harm reduction measures. (1) * There should be the creation of an international "memorandum of understanding" that expresses government commitment to harm reduction programs and summarizes legal arguments in support of such programs. This is in contrast to current policy in which countries that pursue harm-reduction programs are censured by the INCB and the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND). (1) * There needs to be better data collection to ascertain the extent of discrimination against drug users seeking HIV care. (1) * Methadone should be reclassified from a schedule I drug to a less-restrictive category. * There should be a repeal of mandatory imprisonment/institutionalization for possession of small amounts of illegal drugs, because imprisomnent exposes IDUs to HIV, hepatitis C, tuberculosis, and other health risks. (1) * Drug paraphernalia, including syringes, should be made available without prescription, so drug users will not fear arrest. (1) * Legislation that criminalizes drug users based on addiction or past behavior should be repealed, and mass arrests based on suspicion of drug use or as the basis of political campaigns should be prohibited. (1) * IDUs’ confidentiality should be protected when they are in HIV and drug-treatment settings. Likewise, there should be an end to punitive registration or surveillance of IDUs and people with HIV. (1) * There should be an end to practices that deprive drug users of due process while in police custody, including an end to practices that violate human rights. (1) * Drug treatment standards should be set by health care professionals rather than by police officers, judges, political officials, and others. (1) * Prison settings should have harm-reduction programs, including needle exchange, condoms, and HIV education. (1) * Minimum standards of care are needed for treatment and rehabilitation centers, and full-scale drug demand reduction and HIV prevention measures need to be financed by governments. (1) * There need to be aftercare programs for active drug users and an abolition of punishments for relapse. (1) Government funding for harm reduction programs is crucial if there is any hope of stopping the spread of HIV among IDUs and others, Malinowska-Sempruch says. The magic number that has shown to stop HIV among IDUs in other countries is 60%, she notes. "Sixty percent of the drug users need to be offered services if you are going to stop the HIV epidemic," Malinowska-Sempruch says. "If you have one or two harm-reduction programs, and the coverage is 1%–that simply is not going to stop an epidemic; it’s a gesture that shows good will, but it won’t make a difference." Reference (1.) Wolfe D, Malinowska-Sempruch K. Illicit drug policies and the global HIV epidemic: Effects of U.N. and national government approaches. Published on-line by the International Harm Reduction Development, the Open Society institute. New York City; March 2004. Web site: www.soros.org.

Response:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed 'AIDS'

Question:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed ‘AIDS’ under the Bangui Definition.

Repeated garbage, already replied to.

Response:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed ‘AIDS’ under the Bangui Definition. Mortalities (non natural) in S.A. remain at the same 2.2% P.A. that they were BEFORE AIDS. Either every other disease in the region vanished overnight or ‘AIDS’ is simply the old diseases with a new name. You decide. In Africa, the continent supposedly being decimated by HIV, HIV tests are rarely ever done, so there the idea that all patients with AIDS are infected with HIV is based entirely on supposition. At a WHO conference in the Central African Republic in 1985, U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) introduced the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS in Africa. The CDC officials later explained, "The definition was reached by consensus, based mostly on the delegates’ experience in treating AIDS patients. It has proven a useful tool in determining the extent of the AIDS epidemic in Africa, especially in areas where no testing is available. It’s major components were prolonged fevers (for a month or more), weight loss of 10% or greater, and prolonged diarrhea…"(McCormick, 1996). Where AIDS is diagnosed clinically, large numbers of AIDS patients test negative for HIV. As no HIV testing is required in Africa we have no idea how many AIDS cases there are HIV positive (De ####, 1991; Gilks, 1991; Widy-Wirski, 1988). _______ Other conditions common in underprivileged and impoverished communities that are known to cause false positive results are tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis and leprosy (Burke, 1993; Challakeree, 1993; Johnson, 1998; Kashala, 1994; MacKenzie,1992; Meyer, 1987). In fact, these are the primary health threats in Africa; several million cases of tuberculosis and malaria are reported in Africa each year – more than all the AIDS cases reported in Africa since 1982 (WHO, 1998)*.

Response:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed ‘AIDS’ under the Bangui

Definition. Mortalities (non natural) in S.A. remain at the same 2.2% P.A. that they were BEFORE AIDS. Either every other disease in the region vanished overnight or ‘AIDS’ is simply the old diseases with a new name. You decide.

As advised, there is no cause of death such as "AIDS".  People die of TB or PCP or pneumonia or carcinoma or malaria or … In Africa, the continent supposedly being decimated by HIV, HIV tests are rarely ever done, so there the idea that all patients with AIDS are infected with HIV is based entirely on supposition.

Drivel. HIV tests are offered free of charge in South Africa at public health centres to every person who asks for one.  These are done on Elisa and then confirmed on Western Blot where positive.  A second sample of blood is then drawn for a confirmation Western Blot on a different sample.  The same is true in Swaziland. At a WHO conference in the Central African Republic in 1985, U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) introduced the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS in Africa.

Look at the 1985 date.  In terms of HIV this is ancient history. Why not quote something from 2000 or later? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The CDC officials later explained, "The definition was reached by consensus, based mostly on the delegates’ experience in treating AIDS patients. It has proven a useful tool in determining the extent of the AIDS epidemic in Africa, especially in areas where no testing is available. It’s major components were prolonged fevers (for a month or more), weight loss of 10% or greater, and prolonged diarrhea…"(McCormick, 1996). Where AIDS is diagnosed clinically, large numbers of AIDS patients test negative for HIV. As no HIV testing is required in Africa we have no idea how many AIDS cases there are HIV positive (De ####, 1991; Gilks, 1991; Widy-Wirski, 1988).

No HIV testing is required … as a legal obligation forced on unwilling people.  Use your brains and then analyse the information honestly. Not with dishonest intent. Other conditions common in underprivileged and impoverished communities that are known to cause false positive results are tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis and leprosy (Burke, 1993; Challakeree, 1993; Johnson, 1998; Kashala, 1994; MacKenzie,1992; Meyer, 1987). In fact, these are the primary health threats in Africa; several million cases of tuberculosis and malaria are reported in Africa each year – more than all the AIDS cases reported in Africa since 1982 (WHO, 1998)*.

TB is an opportunistic disease.  It is rare (about 10% of TB patients) for a person with TB to be HIV negative.  This can be tested by highly specific HIV tests. Malaria is not linked to HIV in any way. Leprosy is hardly a primary health threat in Southern Africa, nor, specifically in any other part of Africa, or indeed the world.  It is treatable and fortunately relatively rare. There are several forms of hepatitis, one of which is sexually transmitted.  People with HIV usually have one or more other sexually transmitted infection.  In fact, untreated STIs are a major vector for the transmission of HIV, people without STIs are less vulnerable at any one encounter than people with sores (or scars) in the genital areas. Moira, the Faerie Godmother

Response:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed ‘AIDS’ under the Bangui Definition. Mortalities (non natural) in S.A. remain at the same 2.2% P.A. that they were BEFORE AIDS. Either every other disease in the region vanished overnight or ‘AIDS’ is simply the old diseases with a new name. You decide. In Africa, the continent supposedly being decimated by HIV, HIV tests are rarely ever done, so there the idea that all patients with AIDS are infected with HIV is based entirely on supposition. At a WHO conference in the Central African Republic in 1985, U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) introduced the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS in Africa. The CDC officials later explained, "The definition was reached by consensus, based mostly on the delegates’ experience in treating AIDS patients. It has proven a useful tool in determining the extent of the AIDS epidemic in Africa, especially in areas where no testing is available. It’s major components were prolonged fevers (for a month or more), weight loss of 10% or greater, and prolonged diarrhea…"(McCormick, 1996). Where AIDS is diagnosed clinically, large numbers of AIDS patients test negative for HIV. As no HIV testing is required in Africa we have no idea how many AIDS cases there are HIV positive (De ####, 1991; Gilks, 1991; Widy-Wirski, 1988). _______ Other conditions common in underprivileged and impoverished communities that are known to cause false positive results are tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis and leprosy (Burke, 1993; Challakeree, 1993; Johnson, 1998; Kashala, 1994; MacKenzie,1992; Meyer, 1987). In fact, these are the primary health threats in Africa; several million cases of tuberculosis and malaria are reported in Africa each year – more than all the AIDS cases reported in Africa since 1982 (WHO, 1998)*.

Response:

Every epidemic disease is now renamed ‘AIDS’ under the Bangui Definition. Mortalities (non natural) in S.A. remain at the same 2.2% P.A. that they were BEFORE AIDS. Either every other disease in the region vanished overnight or ‘AIDS’ is simply the old diseases with a new name. You decide. In Africa, the continent supposedly being decimated by HIV, HIV tests are rarely ever done, so there the idea that all patients with AIDS are infected with HIV is based entirely on supposition. At a WHO conference in the Central African Republic in 1985, U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) introduced the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS in Africa. The CDC officials later explained, "The definition was reached by consensus, based mostly on the delegates’ experience in treating AIDS patients. It has proven a useful tool in determining the extent of the AIDS epidemic in Africa, especially in areas where no testing is available. It’s major components were prolonged fevers (for a month or more), weight loss of 10% or greater, and prolonged diarrhea…"(McCormick, 1996). Where AIDS is diagnosed clinically, large numbers of AIDS patients test negative for HIV. As no HIV testing is required in Africa we have no idea how many AIDS cases there are HIV positive (De ####, 1991; Gilks, 1991; Widy-Wirski, 1988). _______ Other conditions common in underprivileged and impoverished communities that are known to cause false positive results are tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis and leprosy (Burke, 1993; Challakeree, 1993; Johnson, 1998; Kashala, 1994; MacKenzie,1992; Meyer, 1987). In fact, these are the primary health threats in Africa; several million cases of tuberculosis and malaria are reported in Africa each year – more than all the AIDS cases reported in Africa since 1982 (WHO, 1998)*.

Response:

Hepatitis contaminated ultrasound equipment

Question:

Reading this recalls something I saw in the biopsy procedure room Tuesday. As I was getting dressed afterwards I noticed an open tray sitting on the sink. I looked in and recognized "the ultrasound transducer itself" immersed in a greenish liquid. Is this how it was being sterilized for the next patient? Is that how it was ’sterilized’ after the *previous* patient?? I would have thought something like pressurized steam would be used to sterilize as they do in dental offices. (What was that liquid?)

Our transducers are sterilized by soaking in a solution for a set amount of time.  This is the method endorsed by the manufacturer. There are many ways of sterilizing including steam, autoclave, radiation, etc.  It gets tricky when the article being sterilized is a delicate piece of equipment… CPW

Response:

From what I see in the article, it is not the actual ultrasound wand that is the problem, it is the needle taking the biopsy which penetrates the latex sheath……. Heather, it would be very unusual to reuse the actual biopsy needle. They are always one use disposable.  I read the article and I believe they actually are referring to inadequate sterilization of the wand. Likely the contaminants are transmitted by the needle but the actual "non sterile" part is the ultrasound transducer itself.  I perform prostate biopsies myself, and it chills me to think that there could be any chance of inadequate sterilization…I’m going to double check our procedures as soon as I get to the hospital today… CPW

Reading this recalls something I saw in the biopsy procedure room Tuesday. As I was getting dressed afterwards I noticed an open tray sitting on the sink. I looked in and recognized "the ultrasound transducer itself" immersed in a greenish liquid. Is this how it was being sterilized for the next patient? Is that how it was ’sterilized’ after the *previous* patient?? I would have thought something like pressurized steam would be used to sterilize as they do in dental offices. (What was that liquid?) Then again I’m now recalling how here in NY there is no law mandating how colonoscopy wands should be sterilized, if at all. A wipe down with alcohol is sometimes all that’s done between patients, according to a tech.

Response:

Thanks, Bruce……. I hadn’t had my coffee and didn’t think to check their website……however I did call our ‘Team Nurse’ (Grace) and she assured me that Ron was at no risk!!  Grace told me the same as you stated below and was in no way trying to cover up what was happening According to Grace…….their sterilization techniques are regularly checked at the Cancer Centre and they got a clean bill of health all along.  Plus there was no needle invasion with the HDR procedure. The people who are at a very low risk (they say) are the prostate biopsy patients.  But whether low or high……one does not need any sort of ‘risk’  particularly at this time.  Was I concerned?  You bet.  But I knew the layout of this huge hospital and knew that the Cancer Centre was not part of the Urology Clinic. For those in the US who might find the way Bruce and I refer to this hospital a bit confusing…….Sunnybrook is a huge hospital, due to amalgamation about 2 or 3 years ago which included part of Women’s College Hospital.  The Regional Cancer Centre is a separate building, as are two other ones for elderly patients.  It is also, as I said, our premiere trauma centre. Ron and I were just saying that if Sunnybrook can have this problem and admit to it (as well as the one in Oshawa)……how many more hospitals in North America could have the same sort of problem and no one knows. I am glad that Dr. Paul is checking into his hospital. In a perverse way, if one can stand back and look at the overall picture, it is a good thing that these two hospitals are admitting to this and the Premier of Ontario (Dalton McGuinty) has called for ALL hospitals in Ontario to review their sterilization techniques and submit a report by January 9. What is not acceptable and a total mystery to me is why it took them 4 years to discover that they were not sterilizing the ultrasound wand properly.  Perhaps those in the medical field on this group can shed some light on this. I will probably call our local hospital in a day or so to check on their instrument sterilization……but thanks to Bruce and Grace, I am now a lot less stressed. Cheers……Heather

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The following has been posted on the web site for Sunnybrook Hospital: Bruce Trans-Rectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy General Question and Answer Toronto (November 17, 2003) 6. What is the instrument used to take the biopsy and how is it being cleaned It is a single instrument that includes an ultrasound wand, a biopsy needle and a "guide" for the needle. The needle that takes the biopsy is discarded after each use and the guide that holds the needle is sent for thorough re-processing (process of sterilization and cleansing for things like surgical instruments) after each use. The ultrasound wand is covered with a disposable latex sheath, which is discarded after each use. The wand is scrubbed and thoroughly flushed with alcohol and an enzymatic solution after each use. We are now fully submersing the wand in a solution after each use. The risk of contracting an infection as a result is minimal but we are being overly cautious in asking people to get a blood test.

Response:

The following has been posted on the web site for Sunnybrook Hospital: Bruce Trans-Rectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy General Question and Answer   Toronto (November 17, 2003) 1. How did S&W realize that there was an issue with infection control methods for prostate biopsies? In our ongoing commitment to provide safe patient care, Sunnybrook & Women’s was conducting an infection control audit of all of our patient care areas. The review found that trans-rectal ultrasound biopsies of the prostate, performed in the Urology Clinic, were not meeting current infection control standards. This procedure is also performed in the S&W Radiology Department but the sterilization process being used there does meet current infection control standards. While the ultrasound wand used in the procedure was being properly covered in a latex sheath (which was discarded after each use), and the wand was scrubbed with an enzymatic solution, then wiped and flushed with alcohol, it should instead have been soaked in another disinfectant solution. he audit also found that the sterile needle used to take the biopsy was being properly discarded after each use and a small cylinder guide for the needle was being properly sterilized after each use. As a result of the audit, Sunnybrook & Women’s immediately corrected the practice at the beginning of August 2003. The hospital then began a thorough internal review to gather information and better understand the risk to patients. The hospital-wide review of infection control practices, which is now complete, found only the TRUS prostate biopsy in the urology clinic to be an issue. 2. What is the risk to patients? here is less than a one in 100,000 risk that a Hepatitis B or C infection could occur as a result of this procedure but to be overly cautious the hospital is contacting 861 men who received a trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate between December 1999 and August 2003 and is advising them to obtain a blood test. The risk of an HIV transmission is virtually zero and is even more remote than the risk of a Hepatitis B or C transmission. 3. When did you notice this issue? How long was this going on before it was stopped and how many people are affected? We noticed this as a potential issue in August 2003 and we put an immediate stop to the process and began conducting an investigation to better understand the level of risk involved. We recognized the risk to patients to be very low and thought it would do more harm than good to contact people before having all of the facts. We immediately changed our practice to ensure the wand was being completely submersed in solution. We immediately began the lengthy process of manually sorting through thousands of patient records to determine who had the TRUS biopsy. We began using the device in December 1999 and we have compiled a list of everyone who has had a biopsy with this method during that period and there are 861 men who will be receiving a letter requesting them to obtain a blood test. 4. How often does Sunnybrook & Women’s check for medical errors? We are continuously reviewing our practices and procedures to ensure they are safe. Sunnybrook & Women’s has an infection prevention and control policy that audits every area of the hospital to ensure it is complying with strict standards. Sunnybrook & Women’s is also one of the only hospitals in Canada to have a dedicated Patient Safety Service that encourages people to come forward and report these types of incidents. 5. How are you contacting these people and what supports have you put in place? We have sent our patients a letter (via courier) and have informed them of the risk and although we are being overly cautious we have requested that they receive a blood test to make certain that they have not contracted a virus as a result of this test. We have set up a special telephone line for people to call and ask questions as well as schedule an appointment for a blood test. We will send a technician to retrieve the sample at the person’s home or place of work and we have set up a special clinic where people can get the test with minimal wait time. 6. What is the instrument used to take the biopsy and how is it being cleaned It is a single instrument that includes an ultrasound wand, a biopsy needle and a "guide" for the needle. The needle that takes the biopsy is discarded after each use and the guide that holds the needle is sent for thorough re-processing (process of sterilization and cleansing for things like surgical instruments) after each use. The ultrasound wand is covered with a disposable latex sheath, which is discarded after each use. The wand is scrubbed and thoroughly flushed with alcohol and an enzymatic solution after each use. We are now fully submersing the wand in a solution after each use. The risk of contracting an infection as a result is minimal but we are being overly cautious in asking people to get a blood test. 7. You mentioned you were conducting a review, what else did you find? We conduct these reviews on an ongoing basis and we have not found any other issues. We will continue to conduct these reviews and ensure our patients are receiving the excellent care they deserve in a safe environment. 8. How often should these men get tested? If you had a TRUS (trans-rectal ultrasound) biopsy in the three months preceding August 2003, you will need to have another blood test seven months following the date of your procedure to be sure that you are not infected. If you had the biopsy prior to three months ago, the results should be accurate. If you are concerned, there is no harm if you want to get tested again, but it is not necessary.

Response:

Hi Chuck……. Here is the link to the second story in the Toronto Star…….a bit more in depth on what was and wasn’t done. http://makeashorterlink.com/?J24853496 On rereading the article, I was wrong in that they are being tested for more than just Hepatitis.  Didn’t make sense when I typed it earlier, but we get a very early edition of the paper. Ron didn’t get a couriered letter yesterday, was not in the Urology Clinic at Sunnybrook, and had his biopsy at Brampton’s Peel Memorial Hospital.  From what I see in the article, it is not the actual ultrasound wand that is the problem, it is the needle taking the biopsy which penetrates the latex sheath……. Ron isn’t worried……but reassurance would be a good thing for me…. Heather 8-((

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Watching the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) last night courtesy of satellite dish, I learned of an issue at Sunnybrook Hospital that might occur in other institutions providing prostate biopsies. It was reported that around 800 patients who had prostate biopsies at Sunnybrook could have been exposed to hepatitis because of inadequate sterilization procedures.  As a retired ultrasonographer it didn’t even cross my mind that this would ever arise as a serious issue.  Any biopsy transducer in my lab was always cold sterilized, and cables and the entire system wiped down with an approved product.  We did not have the enzyme eaters that are on the market today.   One of the products that has been suggested for use today is MetriZyme.  This is an enzyme cleaner that is used to dissolve protein material that may adhere to the equipment.  No doubt there are others. I think it would be appropriate to ask the doctor what sterilizing method was used.  Again, it never crossed my mind but now that cross-contaimination has occurred it wouldn’t hurt to find out.  If appropriate cold sterilization methods have not been used, knowing what we now know, I would hesitate to have a biopsy with that equipment.  It is not enough to just wash the equipment with soapy water although it would certainly reduce the possibility of infection, but there is no comparison when the system has been cleaned with a product that will dissolve any adherent protein material. As though we didn’t have enough to worry about. Chuck H.

Response:

From what I see in the article, it is not the actual ultrasound wand that is the problem, it is the needle taking the biopsy which penetrates the latex sheath……. Heather, it would be very unusual to reuse the actual biopsy needle. They are always one use disposable.  I read the article and I believe they actually are referring to inadequate sterilization of the wand. Likely the contaminants are transmitted by the needle but the actual "non sterile" part is the ultrasound transducer itself.  I perform prostate biopsies myself, and it chills me to think that there could be any chance of inadequate sterilization…I’m going to double check our procedures as soon as I get to the hospital today…

Thanks for answering Paul.  Ron’s biopsy was done here in Brampton.  I am a bit anxious because he had the HDR treatment on July 29th in another building at Sunnybrook……the Regional Cancer Centre.  Was this same ultrasound equipment used during the HDR?  Did they have proper sterilizing techniques?  I have no idea. I have a lot of questions.  I will be on to them to find out.  Bad enough to go through this……then see this sort of shoddy practice going on in two hospitals so far.  Makes you wonder if it is more common than we know.  Who IS responsible for proper sterilizing techniques??? You, as a doctor, would presume that the proper procedures had been followed.  But would you honestly know.  As Chuck says…..would the person responsible admit he goofed.  Not likely. Oddly enough, Sunnybrook has always been one of the top 3 hospitals in Toronto……so if it can happen there……  When I ran the CNE Air Show, Sunnybrook’s Trauma Centre was #1 on the List in case of a crash. Followed by two that were physically closer.   This is not a small hospital.  I will see what the latest news is in the paper. Heather

Response:

From what I see in the article, it is not the actual ultrasound wand that is the problem, it is the needle taking the biopsy which penetrates the latex sheath…….

Heather, it would be very unusual to reuse the actual biopsy needle. They are always one use disposable.  I read the article and I believe they actually are referring to inadequate sterilization of the wand. Likely the contaminants are transmitted by the needle but the actual "non sterile" part is the ultrasound transducer itself.  I perform prostate biopsies myself, and it chills me to think that there could be any chance of inadequate sterilization…I’m going to double check our procedures as soon as I get to the hospital today… CPW

Response:

There is a urology clinic at Sunnybrook that does prostate biopsies. Wonder what kind of equipment he is talking about.  It’s one thing to have some guy higher up saying that procedures are followed….getting that info from the tech who hopefully did do the job correctly.  I guess there is no real way of knowing even if you look the guy in the eye and ask him.  He sure as hell isn’t going to say "oops I forgot." Chuck H.

Response:

I had two biopsies — May and June 2003 — at another hospital in the Toronto area.  I wrote to them yesterday about this issue and here is part of their response: "I would like to reassure you that Markham Stouffville Hospital has policies and procedures in place for the effective cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of all equipment used. Our cleaning and sterilization procedures are subject to routine quality control processes to ensure that our infection control practices are effective and meet all current standards. Changes to our policies and procedures are undertaken on an as needed basis to comply with changing requirements for new equipment or new industry standards. After the reporting of problems at Lakeridge Health Centre with Endoscopy equipment, Markham Stouffville Hospital completed an internal review of its processes and the results indicated our methods were in compliance with accepted cleaning and sterilization standards. In addition, the Hospital will comply with the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care request to conduct an audit of our systems and processes for infection control practices. In regards to your specific concerns, it is important for you to know that Markham Stouffville Hospital does not use the type of equipment for prostate biopsies that was recently found in question at Sunnybrook and Women’s Health Sciences Centre." Although they don’t say what the "accepted cleaning and sterilization procedures" are, I am reassured by the fact that they use a different type of equipment.  Sunnybrook is stating that it was unclear manaufacturer instructions for new equipment which caused their staff to follow improper procedures.  They also state that the risk of infection is estimated at 1 in 100,000.  ’Course this could be the soothing words of the guilty, or, if you are the one … Also, I may have missed it, but I was not aware of a problem at Women’s Health Sciences Centre. I’ll be watching for the results of the audit requested by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Bruce

Response:

Hi Chuck……. It did give me a start this morning!!  Ron had his HDR and EBRT treatments at the Regional Cancer Centre, which is a separate building from the Sunnybrook Hospital, but on the same grounds!!  And the date was up to August for this problem.  His first HDR was July 29th. That said……the Urology Dept. is in the hospital proper.  He had his biopsy done in March in our smaller town.  However it is something I am following closely.  I will get the newspaper and give you the full details of what they missed, but apparently it was the disinfectant…….they did wash the equipment with soapy water.  And they say it was only one small part of the biopsy equipment. Frankly, I don’t give a damn if it was a small part or all of it…….this is unbelievable!!  But this is the second or third in a crackdown because they found that a lot of patients had gastroscopies at a hospital in Ottawa, Ontario……just last week or so without proper sterilization.  So they are really getting tough on the sterilization techniques. Sunnybrook, it is Hep. A.  Not sure why the difference. Concerned?  A bit.  But Ron said that they were using an ultrasound whatchamacallit in his derriere for the procedure, it was not the biopsy equipment.  (he was awake for both and said they were different)  We have already had a call from a concerned friend.  I will find the article and state the exact problem…….you would understand it better than I do. Heather

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Watching the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) last night courtesy of satellite dish, I learned of an issue at Sunnybrook Hospital that might occur in other institutions providing prostate biopsies. It was reported that around 800 patients who had prostate biopsies at Sunnybrook could have been exposed to hepatitis because of inadequate sterilization procedures.  As a retired ultrasonographer it didn’t even cross my mind that this would ever arise as a serious issue.  Any biopsy transducer in my lab was always cold sterilized, and cables and the entire system wiped down with an approved product.  We did not have the enzyme eaters that are on the market today.   One of the products that has been suggested for use today is MetriZyme.  This is an enzyme cleaner that is used to dissolve protein material that may adhere to the equipment.  No doubt there are others. I think it would be appropriate to ask the doctor what sterilizing method was used.  Again, it never crossed my mind but now that cross-contaimination has occurred it wouldn’t hurt to find out.  If appropriate cold sterilization methods have not been used, knowing what we now know, I would hesitate to have a biopsy with that equipment.  It is not enough to just wash the equipment with soapy water although it would certainly reduce the possibility of infection, but there is no comparison when the system has been cleaned with a product that will dissolve any adherent protein material. As though we didn’t have enough to worry about. Chuck H.

Response:

Watching the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) last night courtesy of satellite dish, I learned of an issue at Sunnybrook Hospital that might occur in other institutions providing prostate biopsies. It was reported that around 800 patients who had prostate biopsies at Sunnybrook could have been exposed to hepatitis because of inadequate sterilization procedures.  As a retired ultrasonographer it didn’t even cross my mind that this would ever arise as a serious issue.  Any biopsy transducer in my lab was always cold sterilized, and cables and the entire system wiped down with an approved product.  We did not have the enzyme eaters that are on the market today.   One of the products that has been suggested for use today is MetriZyme.  This is an enzyme cleaner that is used to dissolve protein material that may adhere to the equipment.  No doubt there are others. I think it would be appropriate to ask the doctor what sterilizing method was used.  Again, it never crossed my mind but now that cross-contaimination has occurred it wouldn’t hurt to find out.  If appropriate cold sterilization methods have not been used, knowing what we now know, I would hesitate to have a biopsy with that equipment.  It is not enough to just wash the equipment with soapy water although it would certainly reduce the possibility of infection, but there is no comparison when the system has been cleaned with a product that will dissolve any adherent protein material.   As though we didn’t have enough to worry about. Chuck H.

Response:

African AIDS: like the police policing the police

Question:

I’m sorry … what the hell are you talking about?   Denial!  It’s what comes after you have someone to blame for the problem. It’s another one of the useless things that people do.

I posted an article, I’m not suer what I’d be in denial of. It’s not useless to find out the cause of millions of people contracting a deadly disease. Now that they know, they can stop using dirty needles when inoculating their children. It would be "denial" to not recognize this reality.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The medical community decided that the promiscuous Africans were causing the spread of AIDS. What a relief, it’s only been caused by medical incompetence. Forgot the link … http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993417    Oh!  For a moment there I thought that you had something other than opinion to support your premise.     But where would you get if your premise was true anyway?  You could have someone to blame for the problem.   The hard facts are that the infected have to deal with the problem, and hopefully not spread the disease further. Most of the people that advance this argument do so in the belief that they have disproved sexual transmission, therefor they, Typhoid Mary, are not any danger to anyone else!   Odd, I don’t seem to be able to find a journal named STD & AIDS … You would not be the sort of person to make up a reference for something as important as Denial, would you?< I’m sorry … what the hell are you talking about?

  Denial!  It’s what comes after you have someone to blame for the problem. It’s another one of the useless things that people do. What is the question?       Gertrude Stein’s last words No one mouth is big enough to utter the whole thing.    Alan Watts On Display in the UK     http://www.web-gallery.co.uk

Response:

The medical community decided that the promiscuous Africans were causing the spread of AIDS. What a relief, it’s only been caused by medical incompetence.

Forgot the link … http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993417    Oh!  For a moment there I thought that you had something other than opinion to support your premise.     But where would you get if your premise was true anyway?  You could have someone to blame for the problem.   The hard facts are that the infected have to deal with the problem, and hopefully not spread the disease further.  Most of the people that advance this argument do so in the belief that they have disproved sexual transmission, therefor they, Typhoid Mary, are not any danger to anyone else!   Odd, I don’t seem to be able to find a journal named STD & AIDS … You would not be the sort of person to make up a reference for something as important as Denial, would you?<

I’m sorry … what the hell are you talking about?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The medical community decided that the promiscuous Africans were causing the spread of AIDS. What a relief, it’s only been caused by medical incompetence. Needles not sex drove African AIDS pandemic 14:02 20 February 03 Andy Coghlan The re-use of dirty needles in healthcare – not promiscuity – was the main cause of the AIDS pandemic now devastating Africa, according to a controversial new analysis. It challenges the assumption, dating from 1988, that unsafe heterosexual sex accounted for 90 per cent of HIV transmissions in Africa. "We’ve gathered all the literature we can on AIDS in Africa and the best we can estimate, for sexual transmission, is a quarter to a third," says David Gisselquist, an independent anthropologist from Hershey, Pennsylvania, who led the new study.

   Oh!  For a moment there I thought that you had something other than opinion to support your premise.     But where would you get if your premise was true anyway?  You could have someone to blame for the problem.   The hard facts are that the infected have to deal with the problem, and hopefully not spread the disease further.  Most of the people that advance this argument do so in the belief that they have disproved sexual transmission, therefor they, Typhoid Mary, are not any danger to anyone else!   Odd, I don’t seem to be able to find a journal named STD & AIDS … You would not be the sort of person to make up a reference for something as important as Denial, would you?< What is the question?       Gertrude Stein’s last words No one mouth is big enough to utter the whole thing.    Alan Watts On Display in the UK     http://www.web-gallery.co.uk

Response:

The medical community decided that the promiscuous Africans were causing the spread of AIDS. What a relief, it’s only been caused by medical incompetence. Needles not sex drove African AIDS pandemic 14:02 20 February 03 Andy Coghlan The re-use of dirty needles in healthcare – not promiscuity – was the main cause of the AIDS pandemic now devastating Africa, according to a controversial new analysis. It challenges the assumption, dating from 1988, that unsafe heterosexual sex accounted for 90 per cent of HIV transmissions in Africa. "We’ve gathered all the literature we can on AIDS in Africa and the best we can estimate, for sexual transmission, is a quarter to a third," says David Gisselquist, an independent anthropologist from Hershey, Pennsylvania, who led the new study. Dirty needles accounted for almost half of all cases, the re-analysis of research concludes. The work is published as a three-paper set in the International Journal of STD & AIDS. Thirty million people are estimated to be living with HIV in Africa, and 2.5 million died in 2002. Tackling the pandemic requires knowledge of how the virus is being transmitted now, so emphasis can be placed on, say, safe sex education programmes or provision of single-use needles. "But no one has looked at this for a long time, or with the appropriate data," acknowledges Yvan Hutin, a specialist on HIV transmission at the World Health Organization in Geneva. "There isn’t any solid data." Frightened away However, Hutin disputes the specific conclusions of the new analysis. "We estimate that dirty needles account for five per cent of cases worldwide, but with large variation." Agencies managing international AIDS programmes fear that Africans could be frightened away from visiting clinics for vital immunisations. "The other worry is that it might encourage complacency in sex," says Catherine Hankins, chief scientific adviser for UNAIDS in Geneva. Other experts point out that hepatitis B, which is more easily transmitted via unsterilised needles than HIV, has not spread as rapidly. But Gisselquist says that with their mindsets fixed on the sexual explanation, researchers have ignored obvious discrepancies. He says the data contradict the idea that Africans are unusually promiscuous, or engage more readily than anyone else in unsafe sex. Faithful partners For example, in a 1987-88 study of factory and bank workers in Kinshasa, Congo, the huge majority of with HIV-positive subjects said they had contracted the virus despite being faithful to their partners. "Although some may have underreported numbers of partners, the consistency of the evidence suggests a large majority of HIV infections in non-promiscuous adults," he says. Gisselquist believes the role of prostitution has been overstated. In Zimbabwe during the 1990s, he says, an increase in HIV of 12 per cent coincided with a decrease of 25 per cent in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) generally. He also cites studies suggesting a link to the use of dirty medical needles. One showed that HIV-positive children had an average of 44 injections in their lifetimes, compared with 23 for virus-free children. And in one clinic treating STDs, Gisselquist found that 28 per cent of attendees treated with injections had HIV, compared with 17 per cent who had not had injections. Despite the disputes, Hankins says: "We all agree that [needle transmission] is so easy to avoid, and all it requires is resources. We definitely want to get to the bottom of it all." The WHO and UNAIDS have now organised a meeting with Gisselquist in March to discuss his findings. 14:02 20 February 03

Response:

Ok, load counters, chime in!

Question:

Thanks Spoking. A mother always thinks her baby is adorable. It’s nice to hear it from others. t-bear "Spoking" <spok…@bellsouth.null> wrote in message

news:MPG.18bfe82a9ba820f29896da@newsgroups.bellsouth.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> t-bear posted… > > t-bear > > http://www.tolentinos.net > Oh, man, dimples, a smile, AND a wink!? What a baby! Cutest pic I’ve seen > in years. > — > Spoking > <^> > _|_

Response:

There used to be one for SMDH, actually a very good one by Leola. Not sure if it will be back.  In the mean time here is an excellent one. http://members.bellatlantic.net/~clotho/cfaq.htm eileen

Response:

What the hell is a FAQ?  How do you make one and how do you post it? I’ll give it a shot (no pun intended), but I’m gonna have to figure out what it is you want me to do.  ahahahahhaha  Give me a hand, here.  I’m clueless!  Elmo http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

No prob, t-bear!  Yeah, every once in awhile as soon as I hit the ’send’ button, I think.."Why did I post THAT?"…. but not very often. LOL Used Tampax?  I’m certain it’ll be a topic of discussion since they are a possible mode of transmission.  Girls have to be REAL careful where they fling those damn things.  If they hit someone in the eye, it would be instant hepatitis.  Cheap sunglasses are highly recommended when out in public.   Elmo   http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

I just checked out this FAQ thing.  I’m not the person to do this, unless you want me to use my hep/file for it, LOL.  That’s why i created the hep/file, anyway…….so i could post relevant hepc info for scared newbies.  I update it with new stuff from time to time, just the facts. I agree us heppers need a page like this for us to go and get serious answers.  Send me anything you think is a good fit for type of info in the hep/file, and I assure you it will be reviewed by the board of directors.  But it must be in the form of a jpeg. http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

It would be even worse if they had blepharitis…ouch. Sometimes I feel like throwing things during that time but, this woman promises never to through a used tampax. t-bear <elmoemer…@webtv.net> wrote in message

news:26354-3E57A11D-78@storefull-2316.public.lawson.webtv.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> No prob, t-bear!  Yeah, every once in awhile as soon as I hit the ’send’ > button, I think.."Why did I post THAT?"…. but not very often. LOL > Used Tampax?  I’m certain it’ll be a topic of discussion since they are > a possible mode of transmission.  Girls have to be REAL careful where > they fling those damn things.  If they hit someone in the eye, it would > be instant hepatitis.  Cheap sunglasses are highly recommended when out > in public. > Elmo > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

my doc said viral load was not afactor in "the cure"  i am to start meds after i get my iron level down….. last yr. my load ws 853,000.  now doc says excess of 5 million..   but i feel good!  

Response:

so how are you now?

Response:

"Spoking" <spok…@bellsouth.null> wrote in message

news:MPG.18bfea0af05fa5f69896db@newsgroups.bellsouth.net… > And good luck to you as well. > As for an FAQ, most newsgroups I’ve used, currently and in the past, have > had FAQ. The think is it has to have a ‘keeper’. Somebody to take some > responsibility. I nominate Elmo, unless we have any other volunteers. The > location has to be posted on a regular basis. Like every couple weeks. > — > Spoking > <^> > _|_

Elmo’s got my vote. Of course he may sneak in a few FAQs like "do I need to use tampax after my sex change?" or "what should I do if my dog starts sniffing a girl’s cootchie?". No offense Elmo. You make me laugh (and cringe)! t-bear

Response:

thanks elmo! <elmoemer…@webtv.net> wrote in message

news:17665-3E542EE7-195@storefull-2311.public.lawson.webtv.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> best of luck to you, t-bear!! > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile > http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

t-bear posted… > Never talked to the doc about the 12 week result. I haven’t started > treatment yet. I was just told hat the higher the viral load is, the more > there is to fight off……well, that makes sense. I had a bad experience > with that doctor and I’m going to see another doctor in a couple months. > I’ll see what she has to say about viral load and ask about the 12 week > response. > my VL is 7 mil and they said that was high but, they have seen much higher. > take care and goodluck, > t-bear

And good luck to you as well. As for an FAQ, most newsgroups I’ve used, currently and in the past, have had FAQ. The think is it has to have a ‘keeper’. Somebody to take some responsibility. I nominate Elmo, unless we have any other volunteers. The location has to be posted on a regular basis. Like every couple weeks. > p.s.-faq is a good idea > do they have those for newsgroups? don’t know. this is the first newsgroup i > have subscribed too. > "Spoking" <spok…@bellsouth.null> wrote in message > > We need an FAQ for this group! > > —

– Spoking <^> _|_

Response:

best of luck to you, t-bear!! http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/Blizzardof03

Response:

> Hi Spidey. Been doing alright….just busy. I haven’t had a chance to catch > up with everyone. Yes, I found another doc. A friend of a friend said some > good things about her….there is alway hope. > I am happy you’re feeling better this week and I did get a glimpse of your > website. > What a lovely web you weave, Waterspider! > t-bear

Thanks t-bear, but the poor website has been sadly neglected for the past year. I’m hoping to be able to get back to work on it this summer, after tx. Good luck with your new doc. Waterspider

Response:

t-bear wrote … > Never talked to the doc about the 12 week result. I haven’t started > treatment yet. I was just told hat the higher the viral load is, the more > there is to fight off……well, that makes sense. I had a bad experience > with that doctor and I’m going to see another doctor in a couple months. > I’ll see what she has to say about viral load and ask about the 12 week > response. > my VL is 7 mil and they said that was high but, they have seen much higher. > take care and goodluck, > t-bear

Hey t-bear, I’ve been wondering how you were doing. Glad to hear you’ve got another doc, and keep us posted. That two-month wait to see your new doc will go by in no time. Take care, Waterspider

Response:

t-bear posted… > t-bear > http://www.tolentinos.net

Oh, man, dimples, a smile, AND a wink!? What a baby! Cutest pic I’ve seen in years. — Spoking <^> _|_

Response:

"Waterspider" <noapam@all> wrote in message

news:v57mr3c5ii0f01@corp.supernews.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> t-bear wrote … > > Never talked to the doc about the 12 week result. I haven’t started > > treatment yet. I was just told hat the higher the viral load is, the more > > there is to fight off……well, that makes sense. I had a bad experience > > with that doctor and I’m going to see another doctor in a couple months. > > I’ll see what she has to say about viral load and ask about the 12 week > > response. > > my VL is 7 mil and they said that was high but, they have seen much > higher. > > take care and goodluck, > > t-bear > Hey t-bear, I’ve been wondering how you were doing. Glad to hear you’ve got > another doc, and keep us posted. That two-month wait to see your new doc > will go by in no time. Take care, > Waterspider

Hi Spidey. Been doing alright….just busy. I haven’t had a chance to catch up with everyone. Yes, I found another doc. A friend of a friend said some good things about her….there is alway hope. I am happy you’re feeling better this week and I did get a glimpse of your website. What a lovely web you weave, Waterspider! t-bear http://www.tolentinos.net – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Good luck to ya, Loren! http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile

Response:

Not that high, man.   Under 2 million is considered ‘low’.  I think that puts us both in the ‘moderate’ range.  I’ve heard of alot higher than your 8 mil.  I’ll see your 8 mil, raise you 2, and call your hand!  :-) Elmo http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile

Response:

Hi Rob,      I got mine tested couple weeks ago it is over 14.5 million… Larry – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->rob7man…@aol.comnike.com  (Rob 7ManUtd) >Date: 2/18/2003 4:41 AM Eastern Standard Time >mine is 8 million…is that high   :) >honest it is

Response:

Never talked to the doc about the 12 week result. I haven’t started treatment yet. I was just told hat the higher the viral load is, the more there is to fight off……well, that makes sense. I had a bad experience with that doctor and I’m going to see another doctor in a couple months. I’ll see what she has to say about viral load and ask about the 12 week response. my VL is 7 mil and they said that was high but, they have seen much higher. take care and goodluck, t-bear p.s.-faq is a good idea do they have those for newsgroups? don’t know. this is the first newsgroup i have subscribed too. "Spoking" <spok…@bellsouth.null> wrote in message

news:MPG.18bb0ca54a0097db9896d9@newsgroups.bellsouth.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We need an FAQ for this group! > I thot I ASKED this question before, on this group, and now I can’t find > it. > Ok, got my 12 week results. Viral load is down to 100. That’s down from > > 850k 1.5 years ago, 225k at start of tx. I remember reading/hearing that > any result OTHER than 0 (zero, undetectable) @ 12th week meant you would > eventually be a non-responder (98+ probability). My LD (acronym for liver > doc) says no, that ‘2 log’ drop is indicator. I’ve got a 2 log drop, plus > a bunch, but not the ‘undetectable’. > What have you guys heard? > — > Spoking > <^> > _|_

Response:

mine is 8 million…is that high   :) honest it is

Response:

I don’t think the odds are that bad.  My treatment nurse who handles a hundred hepC patients told me that the PEG treatment tends to produce many patients who respond slower, but still get cured.  I’ve had three rounds of interferon/ribavirin and responded the same way each time–PCR of 300-500 at three months, negative at six.  Unfortunately, it came back each time.  I just finished the third round negative and won’t know if I’m "cured" for two more months.  Don’t quit. "Spoking" <spok…@bellsouth.null> wrote in message

news:MPG.18bb0ca54a0097db9896d9@newsgroups.bellsouth.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We need an FAQ for this group! > I thot I ASKED this question before, on this group, and now I can’t find > it. > Ok, got my 12 week results. Viral load is down to 100. That’s down from > > 850k 1.5 years ago, 225k at start of tx. I remember reading/hearing that > any result OTHER than 0 (zero, undetectable) @ 12th week meant you would > eventually be a non-responder (98+ probability). My LD (acronym for liver > doc) says no, that ‘2 log’ drop is indicator. I’ve got a 2 log drop, plus > a bunch, but not the ‘undetectable’. > What have you guys heard? > — > Spoking > <^> > _|_

Response:

We need an FAQ for this group! I thot I ASKED this question before, on this group, and now I can’t find it. Ok, got my 12 week results. Viral load is down to 100. That’s down from > 850k 1.5 years ago, 225k at start of tx. I remember reading/hearing that any result OTHER than 0 (zero, undetectable) @ 12th week meant you would eventually be a non-responder (98+ probability). My LD (acronym for liver doc) says no, that ‘2 log’ drop is indicator. I’ve got a 2 log drop, plus a bunch, but not the ‘undetectable’. What have you guys heard? — Spoking <^> _|_

Response:

I went from 2.5 million to 650 in 12 weeks, was undetectable at 14 weeks and stayed that way until I finished after doing a full 12 months.  Two weeks later, my viral load was 4 million.  You can draw your own conclusions.  :-)  Elmo http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/ABandisBorn http://community.webtv.net/elmoemerson/DocElmosHepFile

Response:

"Spoking" wrote… > Ok, got my 12 week results. Viral load is down to 100. That’s down from > > 850k 1.5 years ago, 225k at start of tx. I remember reading/hearing that > any result OTHER than 0 (zero, undetectable) @ 12th week meant you would > eventually be a non-responder (98+ probability). My LD (acronym for liver > doc) says no, that ‘2 log’ drop is indicator. I’ve got a 2 log drop, plus > a bunch, but not the ‘undetectable’. > What have you guys heard?

My liver doc doesn’t bother with a viral load beyond detectable/non-detectable because it’s an expensive test ($150) and thus I will proceed with the full meal deal (at $450/week to me, ha-ha) with no knowledge of whether or not my odds of SVR are good or hopeless. See, it *could* be worse, lol! Waterspider

Response:

No accounting for stupidity

Question:

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001 Nov;22(11):701-7 Hepatitis C in a ward for cystic fibrosis and diabetic patients: possible transmission by spring-loaded finger-stick devices for self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose. Desenclos JC, Bourdiol-Razes M, Rolin B, Garandeau P, Ducos J, Brechot C, Thiers V Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint-Maurice,France. [Medline record in process] OBJECTIVE: To identify the routes of transmission in a nosocomial outbreak of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. DESIGN: Epidemiological investigation, including screening for HCV of hospitalized patients, and a retrospective cohort study, review of hygiene and medical practices, and molecular comparison of HCV isolates. SETTING: A specialized care unit for cystic fibrosis (CF) and diabetic patients at an acute-care facility in the south of France. RESULTS: Of the 57 CF patients (age in 1995: 2-28 years), 38 (66.7%) were tested and 22 (57.9%) were anti-HCV positive. Eight (50%) of 16 patients with anti-HCV antibody tested by polymerase chain reaction were viremic. No patients had received blood products or had any history of intravenous drug use. All 18 (100%) patients with CF who had ever undergone self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose in the unit were anti-HCV positive, compared to 4 (20%) of 20 who had not (relative risk, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-12.0). Seventy (39.5%) of the patients with diabetes were screened for anti-HCV; 12 (18.8%) tested positive, with 3 (25%) positive for HCV-RNA. Patients with diabetes had routine capillary blood glucose monitoring while hospitalized and shared with CF patients the same spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring. The disposable platform of the devices was not changed between patient use. All HCV isolates belonged to the type 1, subtype b, and phylogenetic analysis showed a close homology by sequencing of NS5b and E2/HVR regions. CONCLUSION: As reported earlier for the hepatitis B virus, shared spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring by finger puncture may transmit HCV. Strict application of Standard Precautions procedures is warranted in any healthcare setting. PMID: 11842991, UI: 21831512 Who loves ya. Tom Jesus was a vegetarian!   http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com Jesus was a vegetarian! http://www.nucleus.com/watchman Moses was a mystic! http://www.nucleus.com/watchman/light.html

Response:

< S I G H – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001 Nov;22(11):701-7 Hepatitis C in a ward for cystic fibrosis and diabetic patients: possible transmission by spring-loaded finger-stick devices for self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose. Desenclos JC, Bourdiol-Razes M, Rolin B, Garandeau P, Ducos J, Brechot C, Thiers V Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint-Maurice,France. [Medline record in process] OBJECTIVE: To identify the routes of transmission in a nosocomial outbreak of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. DESIGN: Epidemiological investigation, including screening for HCV of hospitalized patients, and a retrospective cohort study, review of hygiene and medical practices, and molecular comparison of HCV isolates. SETTING: A specialized care unit for cystic fibrosis (CF) and diabetic patients at an acute-care facility in the south of France. RESULTS: Of the 57 CF patients (age in 1995: 2-28 years), 38 (66.7%) were tested and 22 (57.9%) were anti-HCV positive. Eight (50%) of 16 patients with anti-HCV antibody tested by polymerase chain reaction were viremic. No patients had received blood products or had any history of intravenous drug use. All 18 (100%) patients with CF who had ever undergone self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose in the unit were anti-HCV positive, compared to 4 (20%) of 20 who had not (relative risk, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-12.0). Seventy (39.5%) of the patients with diabetes were screened for anti-HCV; 12 (18.8%) tested positive, with 3 (25%) positive for HCV-RNA. Patients with diabetes had routine capillary blood glucose monitoring while hospitalized and shared with CF patients the same spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring. The disposable platform of the devices was not changed between patient use. All HCV isolates belonged to the type 1, subtype b, and phylogenetic analysis showed a close homology by sequencing of NS5b and E2/HVR regions. CONCLUSION: As reported earlier for the hepatitis B virus, shared spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring by finger puncture may transmit HCV. Strict application of Standard Precautions procedures is warranted in any healthcare setting. PMID: 11842991, UI: 21831512 Who loves ya. Tom Jesus was a vegetarian!   http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com Jesus was a vegetarian! http://www.nucleus.com/watchman Moses was a mystic! http://www.nucleus.com/watchman/light.html

Response:

Hepatitis B Vaccine generated Aids Virus

Question:

John –   Please set your newsreader to REPLY to the GROUP, not to the group PLUS email.   The  London Times article established that "the incidence of AIDS matched the relative numbers of vaccinations".(I respectfully disagree that this story was carried in the mainstream news media. The London Times is NOT MAINSTREAM?  Has anyone informed them of this?  I think we both  know  we are speaking about the corporate controlled  media here in the U.S.

   It’s a bit of a nuisance trawling through newspaper archives, because so few of them are on line, and most of them carge a hefty fee, but unless you have checked the mainstream USA media in that time period you can’t claim they ignored it.  Which newspapers have you checked for lack of coverage?   I was an active medical technologist during parts of the early AIDS epidemic, and newspapers were jumping on and publishing EVERY SCRAP of information, rumor, or speculation they encountered.  I would be totally surprised if this was not picked up off the wires and run all across the USA. The establishment line was and still is that the AIDS virus arose from an African monkey virus that somehow jumped species.)   Well, the establishment EVIDENCE so far has failed to show any other explanation.  Viruses jumping the species barrier has happened before: parvovirus in dogs emerged in the 1970s as a serious epidemic disease. It is thought to be a mutaiton of the feline distemper virus … http://www.abap.org/parvo.htm I’ll admit that I don’t know much about parovirus except for a case that was diagnosed, but turned out to be linked to biological warfare experiments conducted on prison imates.(Do you think the time frame is a coincidence too?):  http://www.whale.to/v/mycoplasma2.html

OH GOOD GRIEF!!!! Not that "Mycoplasma fermentans incognitus" dude again!  He’s fixated on it as the cause for all diseases from CFS to Gulf War syndrome. SEE: Sasaki, T., Sasaki, Y., Kita, M., Suzuki, K., Watanabe, H. and Honda, M. : Evidence that Lo’s mycoplasma (Mycoplasma fermentans incognitus) is not a unique strain among mycoplasma fermentans strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2435-2440, 1992. What you are citing as "proof" is a letter to a congressman full of difficult to verify speculations (I can however, show that the "Dr James Watson" that the author of the letter links to some sort of mysterious shenanigans in the Texas Prisons is probably Dr. James Watson, Radiology, Ben Taub General Hospital and not THE Dr. James Watson of DNA fame.     An infection like this in Texas … probable cause would be the recently identified relative of Lyme disease that is found in Texas and spread by tick bites. Borrellia somethingorother. Could have been an unusually severe parvo infection as well.   For starters, parvovirus is a VIRUS, and a mycoplasma is a bacteria that lacks a cell wall … http://www.tulane.edu/~dmsander/WWW/335/Parvoviruses.html BTW – 70-90% of most human populations are seropositive for parvo B19 so it’s ubiquitous.   And humans carry a lot of different mycoplasmas too.   AIDS is known in Africa as "the slim disease" because of the way the victims waste away before they die.  If you go into missionary accounts from the 1860s through the 1930s you can find references to people dying by wasting away, supposedly from a curse.   This is a big example of disinformation.

  So AIDS disinformation was planted in books that were published as long ago as the 1850s (I just checked my collection for publication dates) and 1860s?  How very prescient of them, considering that viruses were unknown at that time, and bacteriology was in its infancy.   I imagine these people thought they were cursed by the "vodoo" witch doctor. There was one in every tribe ya’ know.

They firmly believed it was black magic at that time, and many probably still do. The Scientific American(March) 1996 published, "The African Aids Epidemic" which states: " One frequently mentioned explanation for the severe epidemic in the Aids belt is that the virus originated here [Africa] and contiues to move outward from an epicenter of disease. But AIDS cases appeared in hospitals in Uganda and Rwanda at the same time they did in the West,[U.S.]

Yes, it is one of the miracles of modern transportation that epidemics can spread quickly from continent to continent. If you read "The Band Played On", it describes how one HIV infected individual, an airline employee, can be traced to the early and rapid spread of AIDS among gay men in the the USA.  He was handsome, charming, and VERY promiscuous. and NO STORED HUMAN TISSUE SAMPLES TAKEN FROM AFRICA DURING THE 1970s ARE HIV-POSTIVE."

How many tissue samples were stored during the 1970s and later tested?  Or are these samples that were collected earlier and taken out of Africa during the 1970s.   (It was reported that a Bantu man from Kinshasa, Congo, whose name and health status was not recorded had a blood specimen taken and stored frozen in 1959. It wasclaimed to have fragments of HIV "closely related to a virus found in 4 chimpanzees". It was the only one out of 700 stored frozen Congo blood that tested positive for HIV. It was later found the specimen did not contain the HIV virus.)

  When were the blood samples taken? Under what conditions were they stored?  And WHICH test was used?   "The nations in central Africa hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic where those in which experimental vaccines were administered.   Which "experimental vaccines" are you talking about? "The genetic makeup of the AIDS virus does not exist in man or primates…numerous scientists have shown,the AIDS virus appears to contain  several recognizable components from other viruses…vaccine EXPERIMENTS in which particles from different types of viruses were combined in humans, animals, or cell cultures, providing a plausible explanation for new "emerging viruses" in this region[central Africa].(3)(4)  

  WHICH experimental vaccines are you talking about?  You just spout more conspiracy at me instead of answering the question.   When I was in college in the late 1960s, studying epidemiology, one of the professors stated "something really nasty is going to come out of Africa because we’re not paying enough attention to it".  And he pointed out the political instability, the potential for refugee movements, the pathetic educational and medical infrastructures, and the grinding poverty. And the utter lack of funding to investigate anything. Maybe your prof knew a little more than he let on.

  He, like many epidemiologists around the world including those at the CDC, spotted a pattern (civil wars and refugee movements, economic forces and the completion of a highway from the interior to the coast) was developing that would facilitate movement of persons infected with previously regionally isolated diseases into urban areas. The same sort of conditions produced the great plague epidemics of the medieval times, and facilitated the spread of the Spanish Flu.  But the politicians weren’t listening. Tsu Dho Nimh — "Imagine that all of the owners of the dogs crapping in your yard expect you to ask each of them _individually_ to stop it and you’ll begin to get an idea of why we don’t like ‘opt-out’." — Joe Newsreader in NANAE

Response:

"The genetic makeup of the AIDS virus does not exist in man or primates…numerous scientists have shown,the AIDS virus appears to contain  several recognizable components from other viruses…vaccine EXPERIMENTS in which particles from different types of viruses were combined in humans, animals, or cell cultures, providing a plausible explanation for new "emerging viruses" in this region[central Africa].(3)(4)  

Total nonsense.  HIV has now been matched very well with SIV variants found in chimpanzees.  This whole "HIV is a mishmash of other viruses" thing is silly. This work was supported by USAID, the CDC, the WHO, Merck and Co., and the NCI."(1)(2) (1)Lederer R. Origin and spread of AIDS: Is the West responsible? (2)Horowitz L.  Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola: Nature, Accident or intentional?

Oh, yeah, Len Horowitz.  Citing him will do wonders for your credibility. I noticed that all your references were from 1987 or before.  I suppose everything since then is either disinformation or otherwise not helpful to the ol’ conspiracy theory?   — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net      These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct.        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants                   were standing on my shoulders."

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I can understand that the secondary transmission of the disease may have been by prostitution, but it is the initial transmission we are investigating. The  London Times article established that "the incidence of AIDS matched the relative numbers of vaccinations".(I respectfully disagree that this story was carried in the mainstream news media. The London Times is NOT MAINSTREAM?  Has anyone informed them of this?  I think we both  know  we are speaking about the corporate controlled media here in the U.S. The establishment line was and still is that the AIDS virus arose from an African monkey virus that somehow jumped species.)   Well, the establishment EVIDENCE so far has failed to show any other explanation.  Viruses jumping the species barrier has happened before: parvovirus in dogs emerged in the 1970s as a serious epidemic disease. It is thought to be a mutaiton of the feline distemper virus … http://www.abap.org/parvo.htm

I’ll admit that I don’t know much about parovirus except for a case that was diagnosed,  but turned out to be linked to biological warfare experiments conducted on prison imates.(Do you think the time frame is a coincidence too?):   http://www.whale.to/v/mycoplasma2.html   AIDS is known in Africa as "the slim disease" because of the way the victims waste away before they die.  If you go into missionary accounts from the 1860s through the 1930s you can find references to people dying by wasting away, supposedly from a curse.

   This is a big example of disinformation. I imagine these people thought they were cursed by the "vodoo" witch doctor. There was one in every tribe ya’ know. The Scientific American(March) 1996 published, "The African Aids Epidemic" which states: " One frequently mentioned explanation for the severe epidemic in the Aids belt is that the virus originated here [Africa] and contiues to move outward from an epicenter of disease. But AIDS cases appeared in hospitals in Uganda and Rwanda at the same time they did in the West,[U.S.] and  NO STORED HUMAN TISSUE SAMPLES TAKEN FROM AFRICA DURING THE 1970s ARE HIV-POSTIVE." (It was reported that a Bantu man from Kinshasa, Congo, whose name and health status was not recorded had a blood specimen taken and stored frozen in 1959. It was claimed to have fragments  of HIV "closely related to a virus found in 4 chimpanzees". It was the only one out of 700 stored frozen Congo blood that tested positive for HIV. It was later found the specimen did not contain the HIV virus.) "The nations in central Africa hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic where those in which experimental vaccines were administered.   Which "experimental vaccines" are you talking about?

 "The genetic makeup of the AIDS virus does not exist in man or primates…numerous scientists have shown,the AIDS virus appears to contain  several recognizable components from other viruses…vaccine EXPERIMENTS in which particles from different types of viruses were combined in humans, animals, or cell cultures, providing a plausible explanation for new "emerging viruses" in this region[central Africa].(3)(4)   This work was supported by USAID, the CDC, the WHO, Merck and Co., and the NCI."(1)(2) (1)Lederer R. Origin and spread of AIDS: Is the West responsible? (2)Horowitz L.  Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola: Nature, Accident or intentional?   When I was in college in the late 1960s, studying epidemiology, one of the professors stated "something really nasty is going to come out of Africa because we’re not paying enough attention to it".  And he pointed out the political instability, the potential for refugee movements, the pathetic educational and medical infrastructures, and the grinding poverty. And the utter lack of funding to investigate anything.

Maybe your prof knew a little more than he let on. It was just about that time that " Kissinger was appointed national security advisor and ordered Defense Secretary Laird to reassess America’s biological weapons capabilites, and then discovered the option of viruses for covert operation operations"(5)    So far, "Monkey B" virus, Lassa Fever, Ebola, and AIDS have emerged and I don’t think we’ve seen them all. Tsu Dho Nimh Here’s another interesting page:

    http://aidsbiowar.com/ References (3)Gonda MA, Braun MJ, Carter SG, Kost TA Bess Jr JW, Arthur LO and VanDer Maaten MJ. Characterization and molecular clonig  of a bovine lentivitus related to human immunodeficiency virus. NATURE 1987;330, 388-391 Mulder C. Human AIDS virus not from monkeys. NATURE 1988;333:396 See also Penny D. Origin of the AIDS virus. NATURE 1988;333494-495; See also Dr. Af. Rasmussen, Jr’s contribution in " The present and future of immunization: Discussion" In Pan American/World Health Organization., Op.cit., p.602 (4)International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis, Milan, Dec. 1974. Develop. biol. Standard. Vol. 30, Munich: S. Karger Basel, 1975 p. 375 (5)Horowitz L. EMERGING VIRUSES p.235

Response:

I can understand that the secondary transmission of the disease may have been by prostitution, but it is the initial transmission we are investigating. The  London Times article established that "the incidence of AIDS matched the relative numbers of vaccinations".(I respectfully disagree that this story was carried in the mainstream news media.

The London Times is NOT MAINSTREAM?  Has anyone informed them of this?   The establishment line was and still is that the AIDS virus arose from an African monkey virus that somehow jumped species.)

  Well, the establishment EVIDENCE so far has failed to show any other explanation.  Viruses jumping the species barrier has happened before: parvovirus in dogs emerged in the 1970s as a serious epidemic disease. It is thought to be a mutaiton of the feline distemper virus … http://www.abap.org/parvo.htm   AIDS is known in Africa as "the slim disease" because of the way the victims waste away before they die.  If you go into missionary accounts from the 1860s through the 1930s you can find references to people dying by wasting away, supposedly from a curse.   "The nations in central Africa hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic where those in which experimental vaccines were administered.

  Which "experimental vaccines" are you talking about?   This work was supported by USAID, the CDC, the WHO, Merck and Co., and the NCI."(1)(2) (1)Lederer R. Origin and spread of AIDS: Is the West responsible? (2)Horowitz L.  Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola: Nature, Accident or intentional?  

  When I was in college in the late 1960s, studying epidemiology, one of the professors stated "something really nasty is going to come out of Africa because we’re not paying enough attention to it".  And he pointed out the political instability, the potential for refugee movements, the pathetic educational and medical infrastructures, and the grinding poverty. And the utter lack of funding to investigate anything.     So far, "Monkey B" virus, Lassa Fever, Ebola, and AIDS have emerged and I don’t think we’ve seen them all.   Tsu Dho Nimh It is my job to completely create professional technology in order that we may seamlessly supply competitive data.

Response:

Hi guys! I was surfing the net and ran across an article that stated " A Hepatitis  vaccine was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. Every one of the recipients contracted Aids." Does any one know about this? Read about it at. http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html

Response:

Hi guys! I was surfing the net and ran across an article that stated " A Hepatitis  vaccine was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. Every one of the recipients contracted Aids." Does any one know about this? Read about it at. http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html

It’s typical conspiracy theory crap, which is why I featured it on Quintessence of the Loon this week (there are dozens of mutually-contradictory AIDS conspiracy theories – I picked one at random). Not a lot was known about AIDS in 1979, but it was obvious that there was a high-risk group for hepatitis B – gay men. This group was an obvious choice for a vaccine test. What happened was that the behaviour which transmitted hep B also transmitted AIDS, and so a large proportion of the test group (not "every one") also contracted AIDS over the next few years. By the way, a quick look around the AIDS conspiracy sites gives figures of "every one" within an unspecified time (totse, above), 6.6% in two years and 66% in six years, and 30% in two years. That’s enough inconsistency to show that this is urban legend stuff. — Peter Bowditch It’s Kooks Day somewhere right now, sport. Celebrate at http://www.ratbags.com/loon/

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi guys! I was surfing the net and ran across an article that stated " A Hepatitis  vaccine was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. Every one of the recipients contracted Aids." Does any one know about this? Read about it at. http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html It’s typical conspiracy theory crap, which is why I featured it on Quintessence of the Loon this week (there are dozens of mutually-contradictory AIDS conspiracy theories – I picked one at random). Not a lot was known about AIDS in 1979, but it was obvious that there

Nothing was known about it in 1979.  In fact, I don’t think even the predecessor term "GRID" had been coined that early.   — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net      These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct.        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants                   were standing on my shoulders."

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi guys! I was surfing the net and ran across an article that stated " A Hepatitis  vaccine was given to several thousand male homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978. Every one of the recipients contracted Aids." Does any one know about this? Read about it at. http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aids-us.html It’s typical conspiracy theory crap, which is why I featured it on Quintessence of the Loon this week (there are dozens of mutually-contradictory AIDS conspiracy theories – I picked one at random). Not a lot was known about AIDS in 1979, but it was obvious that there Nothing was known about it in 1979.  In fact, I don’t think even the predecessor term "GRID" had been coined that early.   — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net      These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct.        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants                   were standing on my shoulders."

Hi again guys, Happy Independence Day! I can understand why not much  was known about AIDs in 1979. The long incubation period would project the "official discovery" of the virus to 1984. I’m trying to be objective fellas but even allowing for intentional miss and disinformation,  an alien from space could look at the conspiracy buffs argument and see facts and figures with dates and documents, and on the other side see the debunkers retort with, urban legend, loony crap. Which would you believe? Explain this: The Times of London, May 11, 1987 reported " AIDS may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign of the  World  Health Organization… The  incidence of AIDS matches the relative numbers of vaccinations in Zaire, Zambia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi and Burundi. Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of AIDS in the region. About 14,000 Haitians were vaccinated while in Central Africa as part of a United Nations program."   Surprisingly, or maybe not, the Times report  was not picked up by Reuters, Associated Press, or United Press here in the U.S. http:www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/hivconsp.html

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Explain this: The Times of London, May 11, 1987 In 1987 they were still trying to figure out where the heck it came from.  The SIV/HIV cluster of viruses had not yet been discovered. reported " AIDS may have been   MAY HAVE BEEN … that is their reporter trying to make sense out of a mass of data. triggered by the mass vaccination campaign of the  World  Health Organization… The  incidence of AIDS matches the relative numbers of vaccinations in Zaire, Zambia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi and Burundi.   Coincidence … there were equally large vaccination campaigns in other countries in Africa that did NOT coincide with AIDS infections.  What those countries had in common is a lot of civil war, refugee movements, poverty (the leading spreader of AIDS is prostitution), and pathetic medical care. Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of AIDS in the region.   And what was that? About 14,000 Haitians were vaccinated while in Central Africa as part of a United Nations program."   And? ……. Surprisingly, or maybe not, the Times report  was not picked up by Reuters, Associated Press, or United Press here in the U.S. Yes it was, and dismissed a year or so later when the data was double-checked.  If you plot the areas of high HIV incidence (urban) versus the areas covered by the vaccination campaign (isolated rural) you see there is little overlap.  The AIDS distribution has ALWAYS had the classic sexually transmitted disease distribution: highest in poor urban areas and spreading along major transportation routes. http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/hivconsp.html Tsu Dho Nimh It is my job to completely create professional technology in order that we may seamlessly supply competitive data.

I can understand that the secondary transmission of the disease may have been by prostitution, but it is the initial transmission we are investigating.  The  London Times article established that "the incidence of AIDS matched the relative numbers of vaccinations".(I respectfully disagree that this story was carried in the mainstream news media. The establishment line was and still is that the AIDS virus arose from an African monkey virus that somehow jumped species.) "The nations in central Africa hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic where those in which experimental vaccines were administered. This work was supported by USAID, the CDC, the WHO, Merck and Co., and the NCI."(1)(2) (1)Lederer R. Origin and spread of AIDS: Is the West responsible? (2)Horowitz L.  Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola: Nature, Accident or intentional?     http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/aidsgate.html

Response:

Oopps! Wrong URL! http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/hivconsp.html

Response:

Explain this: The Times of London, May 11, 1987

In 1987 they were still trying to figure out where the heck it came from.  The SIV/HIV cluster of viruses had not yet been discovered. reported " AIDS may have been

  MAY HAVE BEEN … that is their reporter trying to make sense out of a mass of data. triggered by the mass vaccination campaign of the  World  Health Organization… The  incidence of AIDS matches the relative numbers of vaccinations in Zaire, Zambia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Malawi and Burundi.

  Coincidence … there were equally large vaccination campaigns in other countries in Africa that did NOT coincide with AIDS infections.  What those countries had in common is a lot of civil war, refugee movements, poverty (the leading spreader of AIDS is prostitution), and pathetic medical care. Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of AIDS in the region.

  And what was that?   About 14,000 Haitians were vaccinated while in Central Africa as part of a United Nations program."

  And? ……. Surprisingly, or maybe not, the Times report  was not picked up by Reuters, Associated Press, or United Press here in the U.S.

Yes it was, and dismissed a year or so later when the data was double-checked.  If you plot the areas of high HIV incidence (urban) versus the areas covered by the vaccination campaign (isolated rural) you see there is little overlap.  The AIDS distribution has ALWAYS had the classic sexually transmitted disease distribution: highest in poor urban areas and spreading along major transportation routes.   http:www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_aids_conspiracy/hivconsp.html

Tsu Dho Nimh It is my job to completely create professional technology in order that we may seamlessly supply competitive data.

Response:

Silly question

Question:

Don’t know about B but C has to be passed through the blood. So, that would depend on the condition of the organs involved in oral sex. IOW, highly unlikely. Cody "Roland Fleig" <schwa…@adelphia.net> wrote in message

news:taKN8.45234$fM.40589@nwrddc01.gnilink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->  schwa…@hotmail.com > Can hepatitis B or C be transmitted through oral sex ?

Response:

 schwa…@hotmail.com Can hepatitis B or C be transmitted through oral sex ?

Response:

"Roland Fleig" <schwa…@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:taKN8.45234$fM.40589@nwrddc01.gnilink.net… > Can hepatitis B or C be transmitted through oral sex ?

it would seem most doctors feel that monogomous, heterosexual contact is very unlikely to spread HCV, but they’re not sure. promiscuity seems to be an increasing factor, but that may be only that people with lots of sex partners (might?) have other risk-enhancing behaviors. after reading a bunch about it, i’m still confused as hell, too.  :) from the 2002 CDC SEXUAL TRANSMISSION GUIDELINES FOR HEPATITIS A, B AND C: Although the role of sexual activity in the transmission of HCV remains controversial, results from several types of studies indicate that sexual activity is associated with HCV transmission (103,104). These studies reported independent associations between HCV infection and a) exposure to an infected sex partner, b) increasing numbers of partners, c) failure to use a condom, d) history of STD, e) heterosexual sex with a male IDU, and f) sexual activities involving trauma. to read more: http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/rr5106.pdf     page 61 of that report covers HBV.     page 64 of that report covers HCV. HTH beach 1a/week 11

Response:

"Roland Fleig" <schwa…@adelphia.net> wrote | Can hepatitis B or C be transmitted through oral sex ? Only if you bite. Hep C needs blood-to-blood contact to be transmitted (it is not present and therefore not transmitted in seminal fluid, ambiotic fluid, etc.), but blood-to-blood contact is possible during sex, for example if both partners have small leisions that they are unaware of. So, although hep C is not a STD, it can be contracted during sexual activity, and thus the controversy about whether or not it’s sexually transmittable. Hep C can also be transmitted by sharing a toothbrush or hairbrush, but only if there’s blood on the brush and it comes in contact with an abrasion on the other party. So… hep C isn’t transmitted by using a toothbrush or hairbrush of an infected person, but it can be contracted by using a brush that has the virus on it. Confused yet? No valid studies have been done on the sexually transmittable theory. Studies that have been conducted do not take into consideration how "rough" the sex is between partners, whether they have had any other blood contact with their partner, or, a couple of them, even whether or not they share i.v. equipment. The results of these flawed studies quote anywhere from 1% to 5% chance of it being transmitted sexually. I would say that the studies should say there’s a 1%-5% chance of contracting hep C from your spouse even if you’re celibate. Waterspider Waterspider|

Response: